NBA Player of the Decade: Shaq or Kobe?
Monday 15 February, 2010 at 11:05 pm T Lamont Featured, NBA 3
Kobe Bryant's work ethic has positioned him as one of the greatest players in the game.
At the conclusion of the 2010 NBA All-Star Game, the TNT panel of analysts – Sir Charles, Kenny The Jet, C-Webb, EJ and Kevin McHale – gathered around the unveil the results of the fan voting for the NBA player of the decade.
To their surprise, Kobe Bryant won a landslide victory over his competitors. Here was the final tally:
Kobe Bryant – 54% ; LeBron James – 17% ; Shaquille O’Neal – 13% ; Tim Duncan – 8% ; Steve Nash – 5% ; Kevin Garnett – 3%
Obviously, there’s going to be some error in allowing the public to vote on this accolade. While LeBron James came in a surprising second (ahead of Shaquille O’Neal), the dominant nature by which Bryant won had to be shocking.
While Tim Duncan has led the Spurs to three titles in the decade (and four total), he has not been as dynamic as either O’Neal or Bryant. Their dominance has not been passive in any way. Kobe and Shaq started out together to each win three titles. Then, they switched supporting casts and each won an additional title later in the decade.
But the Black Mamba maintained his individual brilliance, and to this day is still arguably the best player in the NBA. There can be no argument, however, as to the fact that Shaq isn’t even the best center in his conference. Shaq has been a shadow of his former self, and his game has declined to the point that he can’t even be reasonably considered for an All-Star appearance.
Kobe Bryant will be remembered for many things since the new millenium. His foray into infidelity in Colorado. His verbal abuse of a young, undeveloped Andrew Bynum. His public feuding with O’Neal.
And what else will he be remembered for? Being the best, most consistent and creative scorer of the decade. Scoring 81 points in a game. Htting more game winning shots than Wilt Chamberlain had women.
Therefore, from the perspectives of sustained individual performance and team execllence, Kobe Bryant would also be my pick for player of the decade.
Tags: Kevin Garnett, Kobe Bryant, LeBron James, Shaquille O'Neal, Steve Nash, Tim Duncan
Related Posts
Categories
- Boxing
- Featured
- Just for Kicks
- MLB
- Multi-Sport
- NBA
- NBA 2010-2011
- NBA 2011-12
- NBA's Best 2010
- NCAA Basketball
- NCAA Football
- NFL
- NFL 2010
- NFL 2011
- Playoff Central
- Racing
- Tennis
- Top NBA Teams
Recent Posts
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009








Loading...
Dem Kobes…
I say we vote Kenny Smith and Sir Charles the most fortunate ex-NBA players of the decade. Man they got lucky when the landed their jobs with TNT.
And TNT got lucky too. That crew – Charles, Kenny and EJ – complement each other really well and make people want to watch…and not automatically turn to something else during halftime or after the game. The comrauderie is natural and not forced in any way.
Conversely, I hardly ever watch the "analysis" during the ESPN broadcasts. Jalen Rose, Tim Legler, Greg Anthony, Avery Johnson…can you say "no charisma"?
People don't really think about it – but poor halftime and between-game coverage can make you lose your viewers who are impatient channel surfers. They just might find something else interesting and never turn back. Even a super-NBA fan like me might not turn back to the ESPN telecast.
3 comments
Dem Kobes…
I say we vote Kenny Smith and Sir Charles the most fortunate ex-NBA players of the decade. Man they got lucky when the landed their jobs with TNT.
And TNT got lucky too. That crew – Charles, Kenny and EJ – complement each other really well and make people want to watch…and not automatically turn to something else during halftime or after the game. The comrauderie is natural and not forced in any way.
Conversely, I hardly ever watch the "analysis" during the ESPN broadcasts. Jalen Rose, Tim Legler, Greg Anthony, Avery Johnson…can you say "no charisma"?
People don't really think about it – but poor halftime and between-game coverage can make you lose your viewers who are impatient channel surfers. They just might find something else interesting and never turn back. Even a super-NBA fan like me might not turn back to the ESPN telecast.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Please fill the required fields...